First half of the article

The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, OPEC, was established in 1960 at the Baghdad Conference by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela to coordinate oil production and protect the interests of producing nations. The United Arab Emirates joined in 1967, becoming part of a system that shaped the modern oil order through collective restraint and supply discipline. On April 28, 2026, the UAE announced it would leave OPEC and the wider OPEC+ framework, effective May 1, 2026. The decision came amid severe geopolitical strain in the Gulf, including disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz. This is neither a routine policy shift nor a disagreement over quotas. It is a structural decision, reflecting how one of the Gulf’s most capable producers understands time, sovereignty, and value in a changing energy system.

According to the International Energy Agency’s Global Energy Review 2026, global energy demand grew by 1.3 per cent in 2025. Solar PV met more than 25 percent of that growth—the first time a renewable source has led global primary energy growth. Natural gas followed at around 17 percent, while oil contributed about 15 percent. This is not the end of oil, but it signals that its dominance in incremental growth is weakening.

A system built for stability—Now under strain

OPEC was designed for a world in which long-cycle oil demand appeared secure. Its central logic was straightforward: limit production, support prices, and influence global supply. OPEC has survived price wars, quota disputes, internal non-compliance, the 2014 shale shock, and the 2020 demand collapse. But recent developments suggest more than cyclical strain. The UAE is not the first country to leave. In the past decade, several members exited, citing misalignment between national priorities and collective discipline. Qatar withdrew in 2019 to focus on gas. Ecuador withdrew in 2020 for fiscal flexibility. Angola exited in 2024 after quota disputes. These departures were often seen as marginal—smaller producers stepping away from a system anchored by Gulf states. The UAE’s exit changes that interpretation. It is the first major, low-cost, high-capacity producer to leave. What once appeared as peripheral attrition now resembles structural fragmentation.Even more revealing is Venezuela—a founding member. It remains within OPEC, yet its oil sector operates under significant external influence, shaped by sanctions, licensing regimes, and international operators, particularly from the United States. This creates a structural contradiction: a member whose production is influenced by a non-OPEC power not bound by quotas.

This weakens coordinated supply management and suggests OPEC’s challenge extends beyond exits to members without full sovereign control. The UAE’s decision therefore signals that the foundations of coordination—shared incentives, sovereign control, and aligned timelines—are eroding.

OPEC’s challenge is therefore less a failure of institutional design than strategic divergence among members whose incentives are no longer aligned.

From oil reserves to time-constrained value

Over the past decade, the UAE has expanded production capacity toward 5 million barrels per day. Under OPEC+ limits, output has been constrained to 3.2–3.6 million barrels per day. Reuters and AP reporting indicate that the country had been producing around 3.4 million barrels per day prior to geopolitical disruptions. The gap does not represent guaranteed lost revenue—markets must absorb additional supply, and higher volumes can depress prices. Rather, it reflects lost optionality: a constraint on how quickly reserves can be converted into capital.With upstream costs among the lowest globally—often below $10 per barrel in core Gulf fields—the UAE can sustain higher output strategies at price levels that would constrain higher-cost producers.

For much of the oil era, reserves were treated as secure value that could be extracted later. Time was not a constraint. That assumption may now be under pressure. While oil will remain central to the global economy for decades, it is no longer singular. Renewables, batteries, electrification, and natural gas are reshaping incremental energy growth. The key strategic question for producers is no longer how much oil they hold, but how long those reserves will…

Continue reading the complete column on the publisher’s website.

Read full article on Nigerian Tribune